Dozens of options. One question.

Same underlying technology either way. Completely different economics, quality, and ceiling.

Where your money actually goes

• Vendor profit is the gap between what you pay and the tier of intelligence you actually receive.

Frontier prices, yesterday's intelligence

Frontier and budget models now differ by years of capability. Work that succeeds on one simply fails on the other.

The tax never appears on the invoice

It shows up in the work instead:

• Tasks that fail, then get redone by hand.
• Employee frustration with failed tasks results in them not using it, while the seat keeps billing.
• No recourse: you can't choose the model, see the reasoning, or extend the tool.

Don't take our word for it. Ask your people.

The cheapest diagnostic you have, survey anyone using your current AI tool:

Measure the frustration. That number is your answer.

What we build instead

• A frontier workspace on each person's own machine, their files, their email, their work.
• An agent shaped to their actual job, built from evidence rather than an org chart.
• Guardrails in the architecture: nothing leaves unapproved, everything is recoverable.
• It sharpens itself weekly and proposes its own next automation.

What it costs per person

Published pricing. No middleman. Get the AI quality tier you pay for.

The empowered employee

• A team of agents per role, theirs specifically, not one generic assistant stretched across the company.
• Built in real time from their institutional knowledge, the way they actually work, captured as they work.
• Shareable across the organization, what one person's agent learns, a colleague's inherits in days, so it survives employee churn.

It onboards like a new hire. Except it never forgets, and it gets better every week.

Automation counts as output

• We measure people by what shipped, not hours logged or emails handled. Volume is load, not output.
• So the top performer some weeks is the one who barely touched the keyboard. Her automations worked while she did something else.

A wrapper can't produce that. It bills for seats used, so it rewards sitting in the tool, not escaping it.

The trust rails

• Nothing goes out until a human says go. The agent drafts and stages; the send is yours.
• It refuses instructions that did not come from you. Planted files and spoofed emails get flagged for a human, not followed.
• Everything an agent touches is recoverable.
• Access is read-only where it should be.